Tradeoffs Between Global Environmental Benefits, Agricultural Sustainability and Adoption Criteria

“Best bet” Land-use Systems

Country reports

Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn in Cameroon

 

Unique id: IDAOKEXB

Source file: D:\Projects\ASB\ASB Country and Thematic reports\Cameroom Final Report\Final Report&Synthesis of PhaseII-Cameroon.xml

 

Authors: J. Kotto-Same, A. Moukam, R. Njomgang, T. Tiki-Manga, J. Tonye, C. Diaw, J. Gockowski, S. Hauser, S. Weise, D. Nwaga, L. Zapfack, C. Palm, P. Woomer, , Andy Gillison, D. Bignell, J. Tondoh

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tradeoffs Within Land Use Systems

In order to compare tradeoffs across the various columns of the matrix, it was first necessary to come up with summary indicators for greenhouse gas emissions, above- and below-ground biodiversity, soil structure, nutrient balance, crop protection, institutional requirements, food security, and labor requirements.  For each of these, several indicators were developed and are summarized in “submatrices” of the “meta-matrix” (tradeoff matrix Table 21).  Only for carbon stocks and profitability were single valued measures available for comparing the socio-economic and environmental properties of these land-use systems over time (i.e. time-averaged carbon stocks per hectare and discounted net present value).  Although a single value indicator of biodiversity is presented in the tradeoff matrix, it only represents the maximum biodiversity attained over the course of the land use (i.e., in the long fallow intercrop, the measure was taken in a 15-year-old bush fallow, which differed considerably from the measure during the cropping phase).

 

The overall net impact on Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs) is a function of the land conversion process--each system assumes some type of change in land use patterns at start up.  For the intercrop-fallow rotational systems (#1 and #2), this involves an increase in the number of fallow-crop cycles (from n to n+1) and, if population pressure is increasing, a decrease in the fallow period over time (i.e. an increase in the “Ruthenberg index” of cropping intensity).  For intensive cocoa and oil palm systems planted in short fallows, land use is assumed to shift from a Chromolaena odorata short fallow intercrop to a perennial tree crop system.  Extensive cocoa and oil palm systems planted in forested fallow involve conversion of either long fallow or forest land to a perennial tree crop system.  The starting point of a particular land conversion process has enormous importance for whether there will be gains or losses in terms of GEBs.  The rehabilitation of degraded short fallow-crop rotation systems with perennial systems is a clear objective of the ASB program.

 

The same starting point argument holds for the soil structure component of agricultural sustainability.  The shift from a short fallow/annual crop cycle to a perennial tree crop system such as shaded cocoa can result in an improvement in soil structure.  However, nutrient export levels may be increased, resulting in lowered soil fertility.

 

For the intercrop food field in a short fallow rotation, the major concerns are relatively low profitability, agricultural sustainability and the low levels of biodiversity and carbon stocks.  There are potential concerns surrounding soil structure, nutrient export and pests and disease with this field system, especially as the number of crop-fallow cycles increases and as the soil restoration period, i.e., fallow, shortens.  The nutrient export of this system was intermediate; however, soil exposure was higher than for any other system, indicating possible erosion potential.  Given the central role of this cropping system in the social fabric of village life and the underdeveloped rural food markets of the Congo basin, efforts to replace this slash-and-burn system are likely to fail in the near and mid-term.  Efforts to improve the productivity of this system should focus on the introduction of improved varieties of groundnuts, cassava and maize, in combination with integrated soil fertility management.  Fertility management should combine the improvement of the soil restorative component of the fallow period with the strategic use of fertilizers (particularly in areas with developed input markets and good rural roads).

 

The major tradeoffs surrounding the intercrop food field in a long fallow rotation are the low profitability of the system and the decrease in carbon stocks and biodiversity.  This system, the principal components of which are Cucumeropsis mannii, plantain banana and cocoyams (Xanthosoma sagitiifolium), assumes a relatively land-abundant household, which limits its extent in areas where population pressures are high.  However, in areas where land is still abundant and populations are low, market infrastructure and institutional development can also be limiting factors.  The starting point for land-use change in this system is the forest; thus, there are also concerns over a decline in global environmental benefits if this extensive system increases in area.  Low profitability (returns to labor = $1.70 per person day) and the negative environmental effects associated with this extensive system would be ameliorated by an increase in agricultural research targeting the three principal crops—Cucumeropsis manni, cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagitiifolium) and plantain—which have been largely neglected by agricultural research to date.  The relatively fertile, high biomass and subsequent high input of ash fertilization following the burn of a long fallow warrants the development of nutrient efficient varieties and crop management interventions to exploit the relatively fertile environment.  Developing nutrient efficient varieties, along with their multiplication and distribution to farmers, presents a major institutional challenge for research and development in the Congo basin.  There is the “Pandora’s box” issue of whether or not an increase in land and labor productivity would lead to an expansion in this land use type and further deforestation.  This valid concern would be assuaged by broad-based productivity increases in land-use systems.  To achieve this difficult task will require a balanced agenda involving multi-institutional collaboration on the research and development of the major components of the Congo basin farming systems.  The Pandora’s box issue will also be a function of the size of output markets and the elasticity of demand.  If, as is likely, they are small, then an increase in productivity of these systems would most likely deflect pressure to further clear new forest.  Both of the crop-fallow rotational systems are likely to remain important across the Congo basin and should be the focus of land-saving and labor-neutral or labor-saving interventions. Abating the environmental loss associated with extensive slash-and-burn systems will require both alternative perennial systems capable of sustaining rural livelihoods and more productive slash-and-burn systems.  The latter would permit farmers to convert land currently in these crop-fallow systems to what are arguably more agronomically sustainable perennial tree crop systems.

 

The intensive cocoa system with fruit trees planted to short fallow is among the most profitable of the systems examined (returns to labor = $2.36 per person-day).  Both biodiversity and carbon sequestration (time-averaged, above-ground carbon stock values increase from 4.5 to 61 tons ha-1 yr-1) would increase following a shift from a short crop/fallow land use to a perennial tree crop system.  However, there are concerns about the agronomic sustainability associated with the high incidence of pest attack (capsid insects, Phytoptera palmivora and Phytoptera megakarya), which can result in losses of up to 80 percent.  Both intensive cocoa systems receive cautionary scores on soil structure, as the higher level of management and human traffic may lead to the higher bulk density noted in cocoa plantations relative to other land covers. The elevated productivityof this system is a function of an increase in labor and pesticide input.  Institutional constraints in many areas of the Congo basin, such as the unavailability of inputs and scarce labor availability, are likely to limit the extent of this particular land-use system.  The fruit tree component contributes significantly to the profitability of this system, but because of the relatively low value to weight ratio of fruit, it results in increasing transportation costs with distance to market.  The underdeveloped road infrastructure of the Congo basin will also be a constraint to the development of this multi-strata complex agroforestry system.  The most extensive extrapolation domains for this particular system are likely to lie in the more densely populated, humid forest areas of West Africa (Ghana, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, and Togo), where cocoa production is already a significant cash crop activity and market institutions are more robust.  The intensive cocoa system without fruit trees planted to short fallow is subject to the same set of tradeoffs as above, with the exception of the need for urban market access.  Pesticide and labor constraints correspond exactly. 

 

Extensive cocoa systems with fruit trees planted in forest land are moderately profitable (returns to labor = $2.03 per person-day) but entail a significant decline in global environmental benefits (declines in carbon stocks from 210 to 65 tons ha-1 yr-1 ).  If instead of forest land, these systems are targeted to be planted in long fallow-crop rotations, there would be negligible environmental change.  The issue of agronomic sustainability for extensive cocoa is mainly a question of pest management.  In these extensive systems the lack of capsid control, which can destroy the productive potential of the tree stock, is a great concern.  Institutional and labor constraints attached to cocoa production are less than the intensive cocoa systems.  Urban market access will, however, limit the extent of this system.  The extensive cocoa system without fruit trees is the least profitable of any system considered (returns to labor = $1.63 per person-day).  The agronomic sustainability of this system is also subject to the problems associated with capsid control.  The nutrient cycling and relatively low yields in these shade canopy systems result in a favorable nutrient balance score.

 

The oil palm system planted on forest land is the most profitable of all land use systems considered, with an estimated return to labor of $2.44 per person-day.  Profitability is increased substantially by food intercropping during the first two years, in particular by the possibility of producing 10 tons of plantains in the second year.  Global environmental tradeoffs are the most pressing.  Time-averaged carbon stocks decline from 211 to 61 ha-1  yr-1 and, although biodiversity measures were not taken, there is little doubt about the lack of plant and faunal diversity in these monoculture systems.  When planted in short fallow fields, yields at maturity are 6% lower than the same system planted on forest land, due to differences in soil fertility, and the returns from plantain production during the establishment intercrop are much lower. As a result, profitability declines to $ 1.81 per person-day.  Institutional and organizational constraints are significant for these oil palm systems.  Post-harvest processing must normally occur within 48 hours of harvest.  There are also likely to be scale economies in both time and space, which will warrant some type of collective action in the processing phase. There is also the organizational issue surrounding the multiplication and distribution of improved “Tenera” hybrid material.  Currently there are only two suppliers--the national research institute and a parastatal industrial oil palm plantation charging 200 to 250 FCFA per germinated seed and wielding significant market power.  The ready supply and distribution of these highly productive hybrids is likely to be a major constraint to the development of small scale oil palm production systems throughout the Congo basin and, to a lesser degree, West Africa. 

 

Communal management of forest lands for commercial timber production and other purposes received positive scores on all environmental and sustainability accounts, although the sustainable commercial harvest of tropical timbers has proven to be an elusive goal for many timber companies.  The financial incentives attached to the commercial harvest of timber could be a deterrent to the practice of slash-and-burn agriculture.  However, there are numerous institutional and regulatory issues that a community has to resolve before it can obtain legal community tenure to timber.  As currently written, the state-imposed regulatory framework requires more than 20 procedures in order to obtain community tenure.  There are also many collective action problems associated with distribution of benefits, sanctions, and free-ridership.  Overcoming these obstacles is a necessary condition if slash-and-burn farming communities are to limit their agricultural activities to areas outside the community forest.


 

Table 21.         Analysis of tradeoffs

 

Global

Environmental Benefits

Indicators of

Agricultural Sustainability

 

Adoption Criteria

 

 

 

Land Use System

 

carbon stock

 

Green-house gas

 

 

above ground biodiversity

Below ground biodiver-sity

 

 

Soil structure

 

nutrient K balance

 

plant protec-tion

 

 

profit-ability

 

average

labor  req.

 

 

food security

 

 

institutional req.

 

tons ha-1

 

species/modi

 

 

kg ha-1

 

$ ha-1

days yr-1

 

 

            SF-food intercrop

¨

4

(Å)

¨

1.45

Å     L

·

-4.9

·

644

115

Å

Å

            LF-food intercrop

¨

63

(Å)

(¨)

1.51

 -    

¨

-1.0

Å

288

44

Å

Å

            SF-int. cocoa w/ fruit

Å

61

(Å)

Å

1.66

¨    M  

Å

-13.3

·

1,755

109

¨

¨

            SF-int. cocoa w/o fruit

Å

61

(Å)

Å

  1.66

¨    M

Å

-13.0

·

1,236

106

¨

¨

            FOR-ext. cocoa w/ fruit

·

61

(Å)

¨

1.66

·    M

¨

-7.3

·

1,136

67

¨

¨

            FOR-ext. cocoa w/o fruit

·

61

(Å)

¨

1.66

·    M

¨

-7.0

·

616

64

¨

¨

            SF-oil palm

·

61

(Å)

·

1.18

 -

(Å)

0.7

¨

982

94

¨

¨

            FOR-oil palm

Å

61

(Å)

·

1.18

 -

(·)

-0.3

¨

1,654

93

¨

¨

            Community-based forest

Å

211

(Å)

Å

1.97

Å   M

Å

(-1.0)

Å

?

 

 

¨

Key 1--   global environmental benefit (GEB)                                                      

                and agricultural sustainability (AS)                                                                        Key 2 -- adoption criteria

Å = improvement/maintenance of status quo in GEB or AS                                                                Å = favorable to adoption

¨ = possible deterioration in GEB or AS                                                                              ¨ = possible constraint to adoption

·  = expected deterioration in GEB or AS                                                                             ·  = expected constraint to adoption

L =  relatively low level of carbon stock/biodiversity

M = relatively medium level of carbon stock/biodiversity

H =  relatively high level of carbon stock/biodiversity

() indicates tentative finding with further verification required   -   indicates no data collected


Tradeoffs Across Land Use Systems

Comparing biodiversity and social profitability across systems, the two intensive cocoa and the extensive cocoa system with fruit trees offer both relatively high profitability while maintaining a satisfactory level of biodiversity (Figure 8).  In contrast, the crop/fallow rotational systems and the short fallow/oil palm system perform rather inadequately on both accounts.  For both these systems and the monocrop oil palm system planted in forest land, biodiversity will be sacrificed for increased profitability,  as the possibility of augmenting the biodiversity in these systems is low (unlike the potential for increasing their productivity and profitability).  Although information was not collected on social profitability on a per hectare basis for the community forest, its value is probably low (although the returns to labor may be high). For illustrative purposes we have included it, assuming a value of $25 per ha for the collection of non-timber forest products (higher than that measured in Indonesia).  The successful implementation of the institutional reform on community tenure of timber rights would increase the social profitability of this land use system and serve as a deterrent to deforestation by slash-and-burn agricultural communities at the forest margin.  The impact on biodiversity of sustainable logging practices remains a question.

 

The ecological relationships among biodiversity, management practices and productivity are an area for future research, especially in the relatively species-rich cocoa agroforests.  Specifically, interactions between entomopathogenic fungi, plant functional attributes, ant and termite mosaics, applications of copper fungicides and the population dynamics of Phytoptera spp. are important for strategic research.

 

In terms of tradeoffs between carbon stocks and biodiversity, there is, in general (with the exception of the oil palm monoculture systems), a direct and positive correlation between the time-averaged carbon stock in a system and plant biodiversity. 

 

Both carbon stocks and social profitability are high for the intensive cocoa, extensive cocoa with fruit and the hybrid oil palm in forest land systems (Figure 9).  The tradeoff between profitability and carbon stocks is less significant for oil palm systems than that of biodiversity.  The short fallow-intercrop rotation performs the worst in the carbon profitability tradeoff.  The long-fallow intercrop rotation is comparable to the perennial tree crop systems in terms of time-averaged carbon; however, the social profitability of this land-use system is low.   Long fallow systems, though relatively sustainable in the long run, are found only under conditions of low population density.  This is, however, a widespread domain in the Congo basin.

 

Unlike biodiversity, the carbon stocks in these systems are amenable to change and system performance can be improved.   For instance,  typical existing short fallow-intercrop rotations were estimated to have a time-averaged value of carbon equal to 4.53 tons and a carbon accumulation rate of 2.90 tons ha-1 during the fallow period.  However, on-station work with improved fallow interventions has shown an average accumulation of up to 10 tons of carbon using leguminous tree species such as Calliandra spp.   A short fallow-intercrop rotation with Calliandra, accumulating carbon at 5 tons ha-1 would increase the time-averaged carbon stock value of this system to 6 tons ha-1 (an increase of 25 %).  All of the cocoa systems modeled incorporate a shade canopy, which is a major source of carbon in these systems.  Increasing the density of the shade canopy will result in a higher level of carbon stock.  Shade management has important implications for pest populations, yields and agronomic sustainability.  The maintenance of these systems in some cases for over 60 years
with virtually no fertilizer applications is a testimony to the tight nutrient cycles of these systems. 

 

The relationship between social profitability and the farmer’s return to his or her labor is shown in Figure 9.  The relatively linear relationship between these two sets of indicators implies that there are not large distortions between social prices and farmer (i.e. financial) prices. In other words, the most socially profitable land use systems also tend to be the most profitable for farmers. 

 

At current prices, the oil palm planted in forested land and the intensive cocoa system with fruit are roughly equivalent in terms of both social profitability and the financial returns to labor.  In terms of effective rates of protection, the intensive cocoa system with fruit trees had a slightly lower ratio (0.90)  than did the oil palm system (0.92), indicating a relatively higher rate of taxation in the cocoa sector.[1]  Taxation in the cocoa sector (mainly consisting of import tariffs on pesticides and a 10 % excise tax on production) is significantly lower today than when the national marketing board was operating and official producer prices were set by presidential decree.  While cocoa farmers are now under a less taxing price regime, there is also more price uncertainty.

 

Figure 10 also illustrates the impact that an overvalued FCFA can have on farmer returns.  We assumed for the case of intensive cocoa with fruit that the FCFA was overvalued by 50%.  Under this scenario the producer’s return to labor ($1.36) would be lower for than the slash –and-burn systems.  Farmers facing this type of incentive structure would be expected to shift

labor out of cocoa and into the production of annual food crops, despite the much higher social profitability of producing cocoa.  Prior to the devaluation in 1994, the overvalued FCFA was a source of heavy implicit taxation for producers of tradeable commodities such as

oil palm and cocoa, and there was a noticeable impact felt in the Yaounde food market.  In contrast to export crops, an overvalued exchange rate has little impact on farmer incentives for commercial food production because of the nontradeable nature of the most important food crops in the humid forest zone (i.e. plantains, cocoyams and cassava).  Overall, the effect of the overvalued FCFA was to favor food production systems over export crops such as coffee, cocoa and oil palm.



[1] The effective rate of protection is here defined as the ratio of discounted total revenues less the discounted

costs of tradeable inputs evaluated at social prices and discounted total revenues less the discounted costs of tradeable inputs evaluated at financial prices.