Tradeoffs Between Global Environmental Benefits, Agricultural Sustainability and Adoption Criteria
“Best bet” Land-use Systems
Country reports
Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn in Cameroon
Unique id: IDAOKEXB
Source file: D:\Projects\ASB\ASB Country and Thematic reports\Cameroom Final Report\Final Report&Synthesis of PhaseII-Cameroon.xml
Authors: J. Kotto-Same, A. Moukam, R. Njomgang, T. Tiki-Manga, J. Tonye, C. Diaw, J. Gockowski, S. Hauser, S. Weise, D. Nwaga, L. Zapfack, C. Palm, P. Woomer, , Andy Gillison, D. Bignell, J. Tondoh
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tradeoffs Within Land Use Systems
In order to compare tradeoffs across the various columns of the matrix, it was first necessary to come up with summary indicators for greenhouse gas emissions, above- and below-ground biodiversity, soil structure, nutrient balance, crop protection, institutional requirements, food security, and labor requirements. For each of these, several indicators were developed and are summarized in “submatrices” of the “meta-matrix” (tradeoff matrix Table 21). Only for carbon stocks and profitability were single valued measures available for comparing the socio-economic and environmental properties of these land-use systems over time (i.e. time-averaged carbon stocks per hectare and discounted net present value). Although a single value indicator of biodiversity is presented in the tradeoff matrix, it only represents the maximum biodiversity attained over the course of the land use (i.e., in the long fallow intercrop, the measure was taken in a 15-year-old bush fallow, which differed considerably from the measure during the cropping phase).
The overall net impact on Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs) is a function of the land conversion process--each system assumes some type of change in land use patterns at start up. For the intercrop-fallow rotational systems (#1 and #2), this involves an increase in the number of fallow-crop cycles (from n to n+1) and, if population pressure is increasing, a decrease in the fallow period over time (i.e. an increase in the “Ruthenberg index” of cropping intensity). For intensive cocoa and oil palm systems planted in short fallows, land use is assumed to shift from a Chromolaena odorata short fallow intercrop to a perennial tree crop system. Extensive cocoa and oil palm systems planted in forested fallow involve conversion of either long fallow or forest land to a perennial tree crop system. The starting point of a particular land conversion process has enormous importance for whether there will be gains or losses in terms of GEBs. The rehabilitation of degraded short fallow-crop rotation systems with perennial systems is a clear objective of the ASB program.
The same starting point argument holds for the soil structure component of agricultural sustainability. The shift from a short fallow/annual crop cycle to a perennial tree crop system such as shaded cocoa can result in an improvement in soil structure. However, nutrient export levels may be increased, resulting in lowered soil fertility.
For the intercrop food field in a short fallow rotation, the
major concerns are relatively low profitability, agricultural sustainability
and the low levels of biodiversity and carbon stocks. There are potential concerns surrounding soil
structure, nutrient export and pests and disease with this field system,
especially as the number of crop-fallow cycles increases and as the soil
restoration period, i.e., fallow, shortens.
The nutrient export of this system was intermediate; however, soil
exposure was higher than for any other system, indicating possible erosion
potential. Given the central role of
this cropping system in the social fabric of village life and the
underdeveloped rural food markets of the
The major tradeoffs surrounding the intercrop food field in
a long fallow rotation are the low profitability of the system and the decrease
in carbon stocks and biodiversity. This
system, the principal components of which are Cucumeropsis mannii, plantain banana and cocoyams (Xanthosoma sagitiifolium), assumes a
relatively land-abundant household, which limits its extent in areas where
population pressures are high. However,
in areas where land is still abundant and populations are low, market
infrastructure and institutional development can also be limiting factors. The starting point for land-use change in
this system is the forest; thus, there are also concerns over a decline in
global environmental benefits if this extensive system increases in area. Low profitability (returns to labor = $1.70
per person day) and the negative environmental effects associated with this
extensive system would be ameliorated by an increase in agricultural research
targeting the three principal crops—Cucumeropsis
manni, cocoyam (Xanthosoma
sagitiifolium) and plantain—which have been largely neglected by
agricultural research to date. The
relatively fertile, high biomass and subsequent high input of ash fertilization
following the burn of a long fallow warrants the development of nutrient
efficient varieties and crop management interventions to exploit the relatively
fertile environment. Developing nutrient
efficient varieties, along with their multiplication and distribution to
farmers, presents a major institutional challenge for research and development
in the
The intensive cocoa system with fruit trees planted to short
fallow is among the most profitable of the systems examined (returns to labor =
$2.36 per person-day). Both biodiversity
and carbon sequestration (time-averaged, above-ground carbon stock values
increase from 4.5 to 61 tons ha-1 yr-1) would increase
following a shift from a short crop/fallow land use to a perennial tree crop
system. However, there are concerns
about the agronomic sustainability associated with the high incidence of pest
attack (capsid insects, Phytoptera
palmivora and Phytoptera megakarya),
which can result in losses of up to 80 percent.
Both intensive cocoa systems receive cautionary scores on soil
structure, as the higher level of management and human traffic may lead to the
higher bulk density noted in cocoa plantations relative to other land covers.
The elevated productivityof this system is a function of an increase in labor
and pesticide input. Institutional
constraints in many areas of the
Extensive cocoa systems with fruit trees planted in forest land are moderately profitable (returns to labor = $2.03 per person-day) but entail a significant decline in global environmental benefits (declines in carbon stocks from 210 to 65 tons ha-1 yr-1 ). If instead of forest land, these systems are targeted to be planted in long fallow-crop rotations, there would be negligible environmental change. The issue of agronomic sustainability for extensive cocoa is mainly a question of pest management. In these extensive systems the lack of capsid control, which can destroy the productive potential of the tree stock, is a great concern. Institutional and labor constraints attached to cocoa production are less than the intensive cocoa systems. Urban market access will, however, limit the extent of this system. The extensive cocoa system without fruit trees is the least profitable of any system considered (returns to labor = $1.63 per person-day). The agronomic sustainability of this system is also subject to the problems associated with capsid control. The nutrient cycling and relatively low yields in these shade canopy systems result in a favorable nutrient balance score.
The oil palm system planted on forest land is the most
profitable of all land use systems considered, with an estimated return to
labor of $2.44 per person-day.
Profitability is increased substantially by food intercropping during
the first two years, in particular by the possibility of producing 10 tons of
plantains in the second year. Global
environmental tradeoffs are the most pressing.
Time-averaged carbon stocks decline from 211 to 61 ha-1 yr-1 and, although biodiversity
measures were not taken, there is little doubt about the lack of plant and
faunal diversity in these monoculture systems.
When planted in short fallow fields, yields at maturity are 6% lower
than the same system planted on forest land, due to differences in soil
fertility, and the returns from plantain production during the establishment
intercrop are much lower. As a result, profitability declines to $ 1.81 per
person-day. Institutional and
organizational constraints are significant for these oil palm systems. Post-harvest processing must normally occur
within 48 hours of harvest. There are
also likely to be scale economies in both time and space, which will warrant
some type of collective action in the processing phase. There is also the
organizational issue surrounding the multiplication and distribution of
improved “Tenera” hybrid material.
Currently there are only two suppliers--the national research institute
and a parastatal industrial oil palm plantation charging 200 to 250 FCFA per
germinated seed and wielding significant market power. The ready supply and distribution of these
highly productive hybrids is likely to be a major constraint to the development
of small scale oil palm production systems throughout the
Communal management of forest lands for commercial timber production and other purposes received positive scores on all environmental and sustainability accounts, although the sustainable commercial harvest of tropical timbers has proven to be an elusive goal for many timber companies. The financial incentives attached to the commercial harvest of timber could be a deterrent to the practice of slash-and-burn agriculture. However, there are numerous institutional and regulatory issues that a community has to resolve before it can obtain legal community tenure to timber. As currently written, the state-imposed regulatory framework requires more than 20 procedures in order to obtain community tenure. There are also many collective action problems associated with distribution of benefits, sanctions, and free-ridership. Overcoming these obstacles is a necessary condition if slash-and-burn farming communities are to limit their agricultural activities to areas outside the community forest.
Table
21. Analysis
of tradeoffs
|
|
Global Environmental Benefits |
Indicators of Agricultural Sustainability |
Adoption Criteria |
||||||||||
|
Land Use System |
carbon stock |
Green-house gas |
above ground biodiversity |
Below ground biodiver-sity |
Soil structure |
nutrient K balance |
plant protec-tion |
profit-ability |
average labor req. |
food security |
institutional req. |
||
|
|
tons ha-1 |
|
species/modi |
|
|
kg ha-1 |
|
$ ha-1 |
days yr-1 |
|
|
||
|
SF-food intercrop |
¨ |
4 |
(Å) |
¨ |
1.45 |
Å L |
· |
-4.9 |
· |
644 |
115 |
Å |
Å |
|
LF-food intercrop |
¨ |
63 |
(Å) |
(¨) |
1.51 |
- |
¨ |
-1.0 |
Å |
288 |
44 |
Å |
Å |
|
SF-int. cocoa w/ fruit |
Å |
61 |
(Å) |
Å |
1.66 |
¨ M |
Å |
-13.3 |
· |
1,755 |
109 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
SF-int. cocoa w/o fruit |
Å |
61 |
(Å) |
Å |
1.66 |
¨ M |
Å |
-13.0 |
· |
1,236 |
106 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
FOR-ext. cocoa w/ fruit |
· |
61 |
(Å) |
¨ |
1.66 |
· M |
¨ |
-7.3 |
· |
1,136 |
67 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
FOR-ext. cocoa w/o fruit |
· |
61 |
(Å) |
¨ |
1.66 |
· M |
¨ |
-7.0 |
· |
616 |
64 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
SF-oil palm |
· |
61 |
(Å) |
· |
1.18 |
- |
(Å) |
0.7 |
¨ |
982 |
94 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
FOR-oil palm |
Å |
61 |
(Å) |
· |
1.18 |
- |
(·) |
-0.3 |
¨ |
1,654 |
93 |
¨ |
¨ |
|
Community-based forest |
Å |
211 |
(Å) |
Å |
1.97 |
Å M |
Å |
(-1.0) |
Å |
? |
|
|
¨ |
Key
1-- global environmental benefit (GEB)
and agricultural sustainability
(AS) Key
2 -- adoption criteria
Å = improvement/maintenance of
status quo in GEB or AS Å = favorable to adoption
¨ = possible deterioration in
GEB or AS ¨
= possible constraint to adoption
· = expected deterioration in GEB or AS · = expected constraint to adoption
L
= relatively low level of carbon
stock/biodiversity
M =
relatively medium level of carbon stock/biodiversity
H
= relatively high level of carbon
stock/biodiversity
() indicates tentative finding
with further verification required
- indicates no data collected
Tradeoffs Across Land Use Systems
Comparing biodiversity and social profitability across
systems, the two intensive cocoa and the extensive cocoa system with fruit
trees offer both relatively high profitability while maintaining a satisfactory
level of biodiversity (Figure 8). In
contrast, the crop/fallow rotational systems and the short fallow/oil palm
system perform rather inadequately on both accounts. For both these systems and the monocrop oil
palm system planted in forest land, biodiversity will be sacrificed for
increased profitability, as the possibility
of augmenting the biodiversity in these systems is low (unlike the potential
for increasing their productivity and profitability). Although information was not collected on
social profitability on a per hectare basis for the community forest, its value
is probably low (although the returns to labor may be high). For illustrative
purposes we have included it, assuming a value of $25 per ha for the collection
of non-timber forest products (higher than that measured in
The ecological relationships among biodiversity, management practices and productivity are an area for future research, especially in the relatively species-rich cocoa agroforests. Specifically, interactions between entomopathogenic fungi, plant functional attributes, ant and termite mosaics, applications of copper fungicides and the population dynamics of Phytoptera spp. are important for strategic research.
In terms of tradeoffs between carbon stocks and biodiversity, there is, in general (with the exception of the oil palm monoculture systems), a direct and positive correlation between the time-averaged carbon stock in a system and plant biodiversity.
Both carbon stocks and social profitability are high for the
intensive cocoa, extensive cocoa with fruit and the hybrid oil palm in forest
land systems (Figure 9). The tradeoff
between profitability and carbon stocks is less significant for oil palm
systems than that of biodiversity. The
short fallow-intercrop rotation performs the worst in the carbon profitability
tradeoff. The long-fallow intercrop
rotation is comparable to the perennial tree crop systems in terms of
time-averaged carbon; however, the social profitability of this land-use system
is low. Long fallow systems, though
relatively sustainable in the long run, are found only under conditions of low
population density. This is, however, a
widespread domain in the
Unlike biodiversity, the carbon stocks in these systems are
amenable to change and system performance can be improved. For instance, typical existing short fallow-intercrop
rotations were estimated to have a time-averaged value of carbon equal to 4.53
tons and a carbon accumulation rate of 2.90 tons ha-1 during the
fallow period. However, on-station work
with improved fallow interventions has shown an average accumulation of up to
10 tons of carbon using leguminous tree species such as Calliandra spp. A short fallow-intercrop rotation with
Calliandra, accumulating carbon at 5 tons ha-1 would increase the time-averaged
carbon stock value of this system to 6 tons ha-1 (an increase of 25
%). All of the cocoa systems modeled
incorporate a shade canopy, which is a major source of carbon in these
systems. Increasing the density of the
shade canopy will result in a higher level of carbon stock. Shade management has important implications
for pest populations, yields and agronomic sustainability. The maintenance of these systems in some
cases for over 60 years
with virtually no fertilizer applications is a testimony to the tight nutrient
cycles of these systems.
The relationship between social profitability and the farmer’s return to his or her labor is shown in Figure 9. The relatively linear relationship between these two sets of indicators implies that there are not large distortions between social prices and farmer (i.e. financial) prices. In other words, the most socially profitable land use systems also tend to be the most profitable for farmers.
At current prices, the oil palm planted in forested land and the intensive cocoa system with fruit are roughly equivalent in terms of both social profitability and the financial returns to labor. In terms of effective rates of protection, the intensive cocoa system with fruit trees had a slightly lower ratio (0.90) than did the oil palm system (0.92), indicating a relatively higher rate of taxation in the cocoa sector.[1] Taxation in the cocoa sector (mainly consisting of import tariffs on pesticides and a 10 % excise tax on production) is significantly lower today than when the national marketing board was operating and official producer prices were set by presidential decree. While cocoa farmers are now under a less taxing price regime, there is also more price uncertainty.
Figure 10 also illustrates the impact that an overvalued FCFA can have on farmer returns. We assumed for the case of intensive cocoa with fruit that the FCFA was overvalued by 50%. Under this scenario the producer’s return to labor ($1.36) would be lower for than the slash –and-burn systems. Farmers facing this type of incentive structure would be expected to shift
labor out of cocoa and into the production of annual food crops, despite the much higher social profitability of producing cocoa. Prior to the devaluation in 1994, the overvalued FCFA was a source of heavy implicit taxation for producers of tradeable commodities such as
oil palm and cocoa, and there was a noticeable impact felt
in the
[1] The effective rate of protection is here defined as the ratio of discounted total revenues less the discounted
costs of tradeable inputs evaluated at social prices and discounted total revenues less the discounted costs of tradeable inputs evaluated at financial prices.