Global Environmental Parameters of the Cameroon ASB Land Use Systems

“Best bet” Land-use Systems

Country reports

Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn in Cameroon

 

Unique id: IDAJBA2B

Source file: D:\Projects\ASB\ASB Country and Thematic reports\Cameroom Final Report\Final Report&Synthesis of PhaseII-Cameroon.xml

 

Authors: J. Kotto-Same, A. Moukam, R. Njomgang, T. Tiki-Manga, J. Tonye, C. Diaw, J. Gockowski, S. Hauser, S. Weise, D. Nwaga, L. Zapfack, C. Palm, P. Woomer, , Andy Gillison, D. Bignell, J. Tondoh

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This section summarizes the findings on environmental parameters of global concern—namely biodiversity and global climate change variables.  Measures of plant diversity and below-ground micro- and macrofaunal diversity, carbon stocks, and greenhouse gas emissions were made for each of the predominant land-use systems.  Because sample sizes were limited and the typology of cocoa agroforests used to evaluate economic returns was not included explicitly in the sampling frame, the environmental parameters are only reported for a generic cocoa agroforest, based on a random sample of six cocoa agroforests across the benchmark.  Ongoing work at the IITAHumidForestEcoregionalCenter on these complex systems is revealing a great deal of variation in biodiversity and carbon values. The results presented here, while probably capturing the mean difference across land use systems, need to be augmented with further measures within systems to better understand the causes of variation (management, biophysical, landscape ecology) and its consequences for the productivity of the system.  In the case of cocoa agroforests for instance, the more heavily shaded systems are likely to be more affected by cocoa blackpod disease, while less affected by capsid insects. Both are major pests of cocoa that reduce yields.  However, cocoa blackpod only reduces yields, while capsids can caused a significant deterioration/depreciation of the farmer’s tree stock investment by destroying the plant.  The more heavily shaded agroforests are more likely to have higher environmental parameters.  The prelimary findings of ASB presented here have served to catalyze this line of research in Cameroon.

Carbon Stocks

Carbon stocks were sampled using the methods described in the Climatic Change Working Group final report, Phase II (ref).  Forests were used as the basis for comparison.  The Carbon stocks (above-ground vegetation and litter) of the 6 selectively logged forests sampled in Cameroon averaged about 228 t C ha-1, ranging from 193 to 252 t C ha-1.  This value was compared to data for the following land-use systems (Figure 2).

                  Annual cropping phase of 2 years followed by 4 years of chromolaena fallow,

                  2 years cropping followed by either 9 or 23 years of bush-tree fallow,

                  2 years cropping followed by establishment of cocoa (jungle cocoa) over 25 years,

                  A 40 year rotation versus a non-rotational cocoa system established through gap and understorey plantings of cocoa,

                  one year cropping followed by establishment of an oil palm plantation with 146 trees ha-1  with a 7 year establishment phase and a 25 year rotation.

 

The maximum C stock attained in the various crop-fallow systems was 167 t C ha-1 for the traditional long fallow.  The amount is reduced by more than half, to 76 t C ha-1, if the fallow is shortened to 11 years, and further reduced to 12 t C ha-1 with the 4 year chromalaena fallow.  The time-averaged C stocks of these crop-fallow rotations are 77, 32, and 5 t C ha-1, respectively.  A mature jungle cocoa stand contains about 43% of the C of the forest, ranging from 54 to 131 t C ha-1, with an average of 89 t C ha-1.  If the jungle cocoa system is established simply by clearing the understorey and planting cocoa, then the time-averaged carbon of this non-rotational system is the same as the carbon stocks measured.  If the system is established through slash-and-burn clearing and cropping, followed by planting of cocoa with a 25 year establishment phase and total rotation time of  40 years, the time-averaged carbon is 61 t C ha-1.  The maximum C and time-averaged C of an oil palm plantation with a 7 year establishment phase and rotation time of 25 years are about half that of the cocoa system.

 

The rates of C accumulation (sequestration rates) varied with age of the fallow; beginning with 2.89 t C ha-1 the first two years when chromolaena dominated, increasing to 8.5 t C ha-1 for the next 6 to 10 years.  The overall accumulation rate during the traditional long shifting cultivation fallows was 7.26 t C ha-1.  The C accumulation rate of the rotational jungle cocoa was only half that of the natural fallow systems, whereas that of the oil palm plantation was similar at 6.03 t C ha-1.  The rates of C accumulation are quite high compared to most reported for the humid tropics, but they do fall within the range measured by Szott et al., (1994).

 

 

Fig. 2:              Maximum C stock (Cmax) and land use time-averaged C (LUSCta) for the different ASB land use systems.

Greenhouse Gas Emission

Green house gases (N20, C02, CH4) were sampled in five land cover types in Cameroon (Table 2).  Samples were taken only once during the rainy season in April 1997, according to the ASB protocol in use at that time. The same land use cover types were sampled in three different villages, Nkofulu, Awae and Mengomo.  There were no significant differences in the gas fluxes from the different land use cover types.   The sampling protocol was subsequently revised, to better account for high temporal variability and fluctuations and intensive monthly sampling has been tested in Indonesia and Peru (Palm, C. et al. 1999).

 

Table 2.           Greenhouse gas emissions of various land cover types in Cameroon.

 

Land cover

 

Gas emission

 

FC02

(mg m-2hr-1)

FN20

(mg m-2hr-1)

FCH4

(mg m-2hr-1)

Secondary forest (> 15 years)

Old Chromolaena fallow (> 8 years)

Young Chromolaena fallow (2 - 4 years)

Cocoa plantation

Forest food crop field

719

702

836

739

771

112.80

59.81

48.41

136.33

207.59

-5.59

-8.32

9.00

-8.51

-9.97

            N20      ®        Forest food crop < plantation//Forest < Young fallow

 

Above Ground Biodiversity

The aim of this part of the ASB research is to explore methods of rapid resource appraisal with respect to biodiversity and to provide a cost-efficient method that can be readily transferred to stakeholders concerned with integrating natural resource management.

 

Visits were made to field sites at Mengomo, Akok, Mbalmayo, Awae, Nkol Foulou, Nkometou, Bafia and Batoum II, over a range of about 500 km from humid forest to savanna. The scientists recorded 18 plots, focusing mainly on a range from Imperata grasslands and Lophira & Butyrospermum shrub savanna, through different slash-and-burn fallow sequences, to closed-canopy (mostly secondary) forest. Included were ‘Jungle’ Cocoa plantations and sedentary fallows dominated by Chromolaena odorata.  To these were added three plots recorded from an earlier reconnaissance visit in 1996. Site physical and locational data are listed in Table 3, plant species, PFTs and PFT diversity indices (Gillison and Carpenter, unpubl. 1999) are listed in Table 4 and vegetation structure in Table 5. The first ten sites were co-located with Dr Cheryl Palm (TSBF), who made assessments of above-ground carbon. Listings of all species and PFTS collected for each site are contained in Annex II of the  Above-Ground biodiversity working group report (Gillison, A.N. 2000).  All plot data have been stored in MS ACCESS format and a copy of field sheets was left at IITA Nkolbisson together with copies in electronic media. Copies of the more recent data conversions via PFAPro have been emailed to these repositories.

 

Data analyses included standard regression measures and exploratory data analysis using the PATN program (Belbin, 1992). In addition to these, a single index that represented key elements of vegetation structure, total plant species, total PFTs per plot and their ratios, was extracted using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) as described by Gillison (1999) in Box 1. This is termed a "V" index and is an exploratory attempt to seek a relative ranking of


Table 3.  Site location and physical features for Cameroon above-ground biodiversity sampling

 

Site

Symbols

Location

Date

Observers

Lat.

(N)

Long.

(E)

Elev

(m)

Slope

(%)

Aspect

(Deg)

S_Dpt

(cm)

Ltr

(cm)

Terrain Unit

Soil Type

+

 

+

 
CAM01

 

AWAEVillage

30-May-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-36-05

11-36-15

657

0

0

>100

4

Plain

Ultisol

CAM02

 

AWAE

30-May-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-36-05

11-36-15

657

0

0

>100

8

Plain

Ultisol

CAM03

 

AWAE

30-May-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-36-05

11-36-15

657

0

0

>100

0

Plain

Ultisol

CAM04

 

AWAE

30-May-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-36-05

11-36-15

657

0

0

>100

12

Plain

Ultisol

CAM05

 

NKOL-FULU

02-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-55-31

11-35-49

696

6

240

>100

2

Upper slope

Ultisol

CAM06

 

NKOL-FULU MEFOU & AFAMBA Dept.

02-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-55-31

11-35-49

696

6

240

>100

1

Upper slope

Ultisol

CAM07

 

NKOL-FULU MEFOU & AFAMBA Dept.

02-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-55-41

11-35-49

696

6

240

>100

0

Upper slope

Ultisol

CAM08

 

MENGOMO (Ebolowa-Station)

03-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-34-45

07-02-05

554

7

165

>100

6

Upper slope

-

CAM09

 

MENGOMO (Ebolowa-station)

03-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-34-37

11-01-29

576

4

340

>100

1

Upper slope

-

CAM10

 

MENGOMO (Ebolowa-station)

03-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-34-37

11-01-29

576

3

275

>100

3

Plain

-

CAM11

 

AKOK (Ebolowa-Station)

04-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-42-19

11-16-09

554

0

0

>100

2

Plain

-

CAM12

 

AKOK (Ebolowa-Station)

04-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-42-27

11-16-30

554

5

170

>100

0

Upper slope

-

CAM13

 

AKOK (Ebolowa-station)

04-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-43-08

11-17-05

585

5

130

>100

2

Upper slope

-

CAM14

 

AKOK (Ebolowa-Station)

04-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-43-12

11-16-58

585

5

130

>100

2

Upper slope

-

CAM15

 

AKOK (Ebolowa-station)

04-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

02-42-45

11-16-42

559

0

0

>100

4

Plain

-

CAM16

 

BAFIA (20 km after Bafia)

05-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

04-48-58

11-10-27

560

12

50

> 50

0

Upper slope

-

CAM17

 

MAKAM III - BATOUM II

05-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

05-02-40

10-42-04

977

35

205

>100

0

Upper slope

-

CAM18

 

NKOMETOU II

06-Jun-97

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

04-04-51

11-33-17

596

8

195

>100

0

Upper slope

-

CAM19

 

Near BAFIA

27-Aug-96

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

04-48-56

11-10-25

640

25

45

>100

0

Upper slope

-

CAM20

 

NKOLITAM

28-Aug-96

AG/MN/ZL/BS/Ka/NT

03-28-21

11-29-25

0

0

0

>100

0

Swamp

Sandy

CAM21

 

AKOK 'Enuzam'

28-Aug-96

AG/ZL/ Nico-TCHA

02-42-45

11-16-45

550

7

0

>100

3

Upper slope

Sandy clay loam

 

AG: Andy Gillison; MN: Martine Ndogo; ZL: Zapfack Louis; BS: Bonaventura Sonke; Ka: Kanfiani; Lat: Latitude; Long: Longitude; Elev: Elevation; S_Dpt: Soil Depth; Ltr: Litter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4.  Summary data for vascular plant species, PFTs or modi and species/PFT ratio, S/W PFT index, Simpson PFT index*

 

No.

Site

Symbols

Total Records

Unique PFTs

Unique Species

Unique Species/PFTs

S/W PFT Index

Simpson PFT Index

2

 
1

CAM01

 

103

43

103

2.40

0.0789

3.15

+

 
2

CAM02

 

61

37

61

1.65

0.0422

3.41

 12

 
3

CAM03

 

20

19

20

1.05

0.0550

2.93

5

 
4

CAM04

 

54

35

54

1.54

0.0418

3.38

4

 
5

CAM05

 

50

33

50

1.52

0.0432

3.34

15

 

+

 
6

CAM06

 

30

22

30

1.36

0.0556

3.00

  12

 
7

CAM07

 

14

12

14

1.17

0.0918

2.44

  2

 
8

CAM08

 

93

42

93

2.21

0.0517

3.36

J

 
9

CAM09

 

76

47

76

1.62

0.0461

3.55

  2

 
10

CAM10

 

80

47

80

1.70

0.0372

3.59

  1

 
11

CAM11

 

71

50

71

1.42

0.0395

3.65

  4

 
12

CAM12

 

78

55

78

1.42

0.0256

3.85

  2-8

 
13

CAM13

 

100

66

100

1.52

0.0228

4.01

14

CAM14

 

61

44

61

1.39

0.0309

3.65

  1S

 

P

 
15

CAM15

 

63

43

63

1.47

0.0426

3.52

  D

 
16

CAM16

 

51

37

51

1.38

0.0358

3.49

1-25

 
17

CAM17

 

47

41

47

1.15

0.0267

3.67

  H

 
18

CAM18

 

45

29

45

1.55

0.0528

3.17

19

CAM19

 

25

18

25

1.39

0.0656

2.81

45

 
20

CAM20

 

57

29

57

1.97

0.0612

3.08

21

CAM21

 

57

41

57

1.39

0.0360

3.55

 

* S/W = Shannon-Wiener diversity index for PFTs; Simpson’s diversity index for PFTs (Gillison and Carpenter, unpubl.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 5.           Vegetation structural data

 

Site

Vegetation

M_Can

CC

CW

CNW

Wdy

Bry

Litter

M_BA

M_FI

FI CV%

CAM01

 Not previously gardened; very disturbed; secondary forest. Logged 15 yrs

20.00

70

0

0

7

3

4

18.00

26.25

88.24

CAM02

2 year Chromolaena fallow

2.50

95

0

0

9

2

8

2.00

100.00

0.00

CAM03

New garden with groundnut, Cassava

0.40

5

0

0

2

1

0

0.50

90.50

32.31

CAM04

8-10 year Chromolaena fallow ex forest.

3.50

95

0

0

9

2

12

4.67

65.50

64.48

CAM05

Secondary forest heavily disturbed

12.00

95

0

0

8

3

2

7.33

45.00

64.89

CAM06

4 year Chromolaena fallow with Oil Palm

2.60

95

0

0

9

2

1

2.17

100.00

0.00

CAM07

New garden (Egusi melon); slashed and burned 8 months prev.

0.40

30

0

0

1

1

0

4.67

17.25

147.94

CAM08

Secondary forest - logged.

18.00

70

0

0

7

5

6

20.67

37.50

78.64

CAM09

2 year Chromolaena fallow - from secondary forest

2.50

95

0

0

9

1

1

0.50

100.00

0.00

CAM10

Cocoa plantation non maintained (Jungle cocoa (T. cocoa) > 45 years)

12.00

75

0

0

6

3

3

17.33

15.75

172.74

CAM11

2 year Chromolaena fallow from secondary forest.

2.30

95

0

0

9

1

2

1.50

80.00

51.30

CAM12

One year old garden fallow slash-burn ex forest

2.00

90

0

0

8

1

0

1.00

75.00

59.23

CAM13

4 year Chromolaena fallow ex forest

3.50

95

0

0

8

2

2

1.00

58.60

76.88

CAM14

2 year Chromolaena fallow (from an 8 years fallow)

2.50

95

0

0

9

2

2

1.00

79.25

51.35

CAM15

Cocoa plantation maintained < 30 years

18.00

75

0

0

3

5

4

20.00

51.00

44.49

CAM16

1 year Cassava (only) crop after major planting. Last year sedentary.

2.50

50

0

0

6

1

0

2.00

85.00

24.66

CAM17

Humid savanna (Shrub savanna dominated by Lophira / Butyrosperma)

3.00

70

0

0

3

1

0

2.00

86.25

26.46

CAM18

1 year Chromolaena fallow following 25 years mult. Chromolaena fallows.

1.80

98

0

0

10

1

0

0.20

95.25

22.30

CAM19

Annually fired savanna, tall grass (Hyparrhenia)

4.00

8

0

0

2

1

0

0.67

76.75

29.84

CAM20

Slightly disturbed, Raffia palm swamp.

18.00

90

0

0

8

2

0

14.00

17.00

103.83

CAM21

Old secondary forest (Old coppice slumps, upper storey & dense

Tabernaemontana under storey ca. 1-2 m. Many ground Marantaceae.)

20.00

85

0

0

8

5

3

26.00

31.75

79.36

 

M_Can: Mean Canopy Height ; CC: Crown Cove%r; CW: Crown Cover% Woody plants; CNW: Crown Cover% Non Woody plants; M_BA: Mean Basal Area m2 ha-1; Bry: Bryophyte cover-abundance; Wdy: Woody Plants<1.5m tall, cover-abundance; M_FI: Mean


vegetation that may have the potential to serve as a useful correlate for biodiversity and site productivity potential or carbon sequestration. The elements included vegetation structure, species and PFTs and V-Indices arranged according to site (Table 6) and according to the ranked "V" index itself (Table 7).  Cumulative species/area, PFT/area and spp/PFT ratio/area curves were plotted for each contiguous 5x5 metre quadrat along the 40m transect, using PFAPro.

 

Table 6.        Matrix values for above-ground plant biodiversity arranged according to site

 

Plot No

Mean_ht

Basal_A

PFTs

Species

Spp:PFT

V-Index

Camasb01

20

18

43

103

2.40

0.10

Camasb02

2.5

2

37

61

1.65

0.67

Camasb03

0.4

0.8

19

20

1.05

0.94

Camasb04

3.5

4.7

35

53

1.51

0.71

Camasb05

12

7.3

32

50

1.56

0.54

Camasb06

26

2.2

24

29

1.21

1.00

Camasb07

0.4

4.7

12

14

1.17

0.96

Camasb08

18

20.7

41

93

2.27

0.15

Camasb09

2.5

0.5

45

76

1.69

0.63

Camasb10

12

17.3

47

80

1.70

0.38

Camasb11

2.3

2

49

71

1.45

0.67

Camasb12

2

1.3

55

78

1.42

0.65

Camasb13

3.5

1

66

100

1.52

0.53

Camasb14

2.5

1

44

61

1.39

0.69

Camasb15

18

20

29

45

1.55

0.35

Camasb16

2.5

2

44

63

1.43

0.69

Camasb17

3

2

40

51

1.28

0.72

Camasb18

1.8

0.2

41

47

1.15

0.78

Camasb19

4

0.7

18

25

1.39

0.87

Camasb20

18

14

29

57

1.97

0.32

Camasb21

20

26

41

57

1.39

0.27