Warning: in D:\sites\asb.cgiar.org\html\includes\database.mysqli.inc on line 128
Cuantificación Del Carbono Secuestrado Por Algunos Sistemas Agroforestales Y Testigos En Tres Pisos Ecológicos De La Amazonía Del Perú.

Cuantificación Del Carbono Secuestrado Por Algunos Sistemas Agroforestales Y Testigos En Tres Pisos Ecológicos De La Amazonía Del Perú.

TitleCuantificación Del Carbono Secuestrado Por Algunos Sistemas Agroforestales Y Testigos En Tres Pisos Ecológicos De La Amazonía Del Perú.
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2001
AuthorsCallo-Concha D, Krishnamurthy L, Cheerful J
ContactAuthorasb@cgiar.org
Conference NameInternational Symposium Measuring and Monitoring Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems
Date PublishedOctober 2001
Conference LocationValdivia - Chile
Keywordsagroforestry systems, carbon sequestration, land use systems
AbstractIn the Peruvian Amazon and the second semester of DURING 2000, we evaluate-the volumes of secuestrated coal by six agroforestry systems and / or land use systems: primary forest, regeneration forest, coffee + shade, pasture + trees, pasture and home garden. In three ecological Situations (blocks). We had for the total sample Consider a) tree biomass, b) and herbaceous biomass arbustive, c) litter and d) soil. About the total carbon, the primary parameter forest, tC has stored 465.8 -1, In 58% to Overcome the treatments: home garden and coffee + shade, 74.3% in the fourth to: pasture + trees and 80% to the other parameter, pasture. However, Those are ones plus forest regeneration and Less Than Statistically similar the primary forest. (p <0.01). The MOST stable Was the soil drain (p ​​<0.01) in all cases it Retain primary forest-except-more Than the half of total carbon. The increments are proportionally inverse Between the tree and soil drains, it Covering of the trees depend with Which They count; the contributions of the rest of vegetative biomass (Herbs, schrubs and litter) Vary in 1 to 2%, the Provider for trees are considerably high death But changeable in treatments: primary forest, forest regeneration and coffee + shade. So, The difference exclusively depend of the Proportion of the arboreal biomass (p <0.05).
URLhttp://www.uach.cl/procarbono/pdf/simposio_carbono/53_Callo_Concha.PDF