<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sa, C.P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Santos, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lunz, A.M.P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Franke, I.L.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">asb@cgiar.org</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Análise Financeira E Institucional Dos Três Principais Sistemas Agroflorestais Adotados Pelos Produtores Do Reca.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Circular Tecnica</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial and Institutional Analysis the Three Major Systems Agro-Forestry Taken By Producers of Reca.</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agroforestry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Degradation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">diversification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">environmental</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farmers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Livestock</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">natural resources</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainable</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">May 2000</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://catuaba.cpafac.embrapa.br/pdf/cirtec33.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Embrapa Acre</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Portuguese</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Montagnini et al. (1992) claim that the agroforestry systems (AFS) adapt very well to the production schedule of family farms,
boosting the use of manpower available in the property. diversification and integration of crops and livestock are extremely beneficial to environmental and sociocultural conditions of small farmers. according to same source, this system of land use constitutes an alternative for minimize environmental degradation, from a development perspective sustainable. Due to the greater diversity of species in the system, there is better use of natural resources (nutrients, water and light) in the tree component generally contributes to protecting and improving the soil and maintaining the process of direct cycling of  nutrients. Additionally, you can improve the living standards of rural workers, as favors economic sustainability.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>