<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">van Noordwijk, M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tomich, T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">B Verbist</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">asb@cgiar.org</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">m.van-Noordwijk@cgiar.org</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Negotiation Support Models for Integrated Natural Resource Management in Tropical Forest Margins.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecology and Society</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">adaptive learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">adaptive options</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">agroforests</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indonesia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Integrated Natural Resource Management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">land-use change scenarios</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">negotiation support models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantitative impact assessments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scaling rules</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">stakeholders</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainability assessments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tropical forest margins</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol5/iss2/art21/</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Natural resource management research has to evolve from a focus on plans, maps, and regulations to an acknowledgment of the complex, sometimes chaotic, reality in the field, with a large number of actors making their own decisions. As outside actors, we can only try to facilitate and support a process of negotiation among the stakeholders. Such negotiation involves understanding the perspectives of all stakeholders, analyzing complementarities in views, identifying where differences may be settled by “science,” where science and social action can bring innovative alternatives for reconciliation, and where compromises will be necessary to move ahead. We distinguish between natural resource management problems at village level, within country, or trans boundary, and those that relate local stakeholder decisions to global issues such as biodiversity conservation. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record></records></xml>